Many end up choosing two web content management systems

The specialization of web content management systems for specific use is reflected as a phenomenon in the customers´ technology choices. Today, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to solve all online publishing challenges with one platform. Therefore, when there is a decision to be made, more and more end up choosing two different systems.

North Patrol is a consulting firm specialized in the design of digital services and information systems. We shape ideas into a vision and service concept, find the best architectural and technological solutions, design a functional user experience, and compete to find the ideal partner for implementation work. We do not sell implementation projects, nor do we sell licenses; we are genuinely on the side of the customer.

23 November 2020

Perttu Tolvanen

This article is a part of CMS selection article series by North Patrol. 

North Patrol helps customers to make smart technology decisions and find the best implementation partners. Typically, we facilitate prestudy projects and evaluate vendors and proposals. Most of our clients are large companies headquartered in Finland.

For example, in Finland, many universities' various publishing needs have ended up using the combination of Drupal and WordPress. Typically, Drupal serves as the platform for an extensive and versatile main site, while homepage systems that run thousands of research projects, research teams, events or conferences, and project sites are run on WordPress.

Several bigger cities have also chosen similarly. For example, the city of Tampere's new online services, which are currently in the tendering phase, will be built on the combination of Drupal and WordPress.

Similar types of combined solutions are also used in the online communications of many large companies. The main site and other larger sites may be built on Episerver, for example, but in addition to this, various campaign sites or small country sites may run on WordPress.

Many U.S.-based companies have also ended up making campaign sites on Wix or Squarespace, as these are popular tools in the Americas, and often tend to work much better for fast use than the heavy content management systems used on the main sites.

The same phenomenon can be seen in the field of online shopping. A large and successful e-commerce site in the Finnish market may have been implemented on the Magento platform with a large budget, but smaller web stores in other countries may well be run on Shopify, which is a much lighter e-commerce solution.

There are both technical and consumer trends behind the phenomenon

The biggest factor is probably the specialization of systems mentioned at the beginning of this blog. In recent years, there has been a shift from general-purpose mammoth systems to more specialized systems aimed at quite limited use purposes. A good example of this is the Shopify e-commerce platform, which doesn't even try to solve the e-commerce challenges of the largest companies, but focuses on the challenges of SMEs and other fairly simple online stores.

On the web content management side, WordPress has long been profiled as an agile platform for small and medium-sized websites. Of course, larger sites are also made with WordPress from time to time, but still, the majority of the sites are pretty simple.

Another significant trend is the diversification of customers´ online publishing needs and web application needs. Large organizations in particular have a wide range of needs that are very difficult to address with a single system. Often the requirements for the main site are very diverse and there may be many integrations and content editors, for example.

In addition to the main site, there are needs for several smaller sites which can have much simpler requirements.

Few content management systems today are able to serve these two extremes. And there are several areas of similar conflicting requirements.

More and more often, there are also needs for completely customized web applications and various transaction systems. In that case, it may make the most sense to make this application-like part entirely tailor-made and leave content management entirely as a background system. Such a situation increases the likelihood that the online services as a whole ultimately consists of several, technically very different components.

North Patrol also has several customers who, for example, have a Contentful platform in use to manage the content of customized web applications. However, Contentful is not designed to manage the content of large communications online services, and therefore they often have their main site built on a more traditional web content management system.

Good preparation and management of the entity are emphasized

If an organization wants to do things smartly and cost-effectively, it is increasingly important to think in advance about its own concepts and the systems that are suitable for them. Often the same problem can be solved in many ways, and often the price differences between different systems can be really significant.

For example, the Drupal + WordPress combination, favoured by universities, is not only based on better functionality of the systems for the chosen tasks, but there is also a significant cost difference behind it. Drupal is designed as a platform for big websites, and is often a cost-effective solution for that. WordPress, on the other hand, is especially effective in situations where you need to manage a huge number of reasonably small and similar sites, and the cost benefits can be significant.

This development is likely to continue. The systems get more specialized and the number of service solutions is growing all the time. Both trends emphasize the importance of good preparation and smart choices.

More and more often, a good choice in technology means, in fact, making many choices.

Perttu Tolvanen

Perttu Tolvanen is a web concept design and content management system expert.

Perttu consults with clients on project planning and defining requirements, and supports customers in selecting content management systems and implementation partners. His areas of specialisation include facilitating concept design workshops and selecting content management systems.

Perttu has ten years of experience with web and intranet projects, including serving as a project manager and consultant. Earlier in his career Perttu has worked in procurement and as a project manager at a large media company, a content management system consultant at a large IT company and an independent, neutral consultant at his own firm. He is also a well-known seminar speaker and blogger. Perttu is also the editor of Vierityspalkki.fi, a Finnish blog about the Finnish internet and its creators.

Websites

Building a complex and content-heavy website? North Patrol's team helps you design data structures, user interfaces and key functionalities.

Read about our services

Request a quote

About North Patrol

We’re eight experienced consultants — designers and technology specialists — focused on vendor-neutral, practical results. Every year, we complete 30-40 customer engagements with customer satisfaction at 9.5/10. Clients come to us to make confident decisions and deliver better digital services.

Read more about us

How to work with us

  • Small consulting engagement

    A small engagement is ideal when you need a clear answer to a specific question, a tough decision supported by independent analysis, or simply a quick outside view.

    Pricing is a fixed fee agreed in advance to keep things predictable, and getting started is as simple as sharing your goals and any background material so we can propose a crisp scope and price.

  • Prestudy & feasibility evaluation projects

    A prestudy is the right choice when you are framing a larger initiative, building internal alignment, or testing whether an idea is worth pursuing — for example a platform change, a new digital service, a consolidation effort, or an AI/automation use case.

    In four to eight weeks we interview key stakeholders, map needs, assess the current state across content, architecture, integrations, and governance, and combine vendor‑neutral market insight with technical feasibility and risk analysis.

    We then outline effort, budget, and timeline ranges with clear assumptions and scenarios, and we shape a high‑level solution concept and target architecture sketch.

  • Supervision & quality control for technical implementation

    Independent supervision is most effective when you already have a delivery partner and want oversight that keeps scope, quality, and budget on track.

    We manage risks, provide executive‑level updates, support acceptance testing, and conduct readiness reviews before go‑live.

Back to top